PREMIUM
AAA's 10* COAST-TO-COAST EXPRESS (+$27,320 Run w/ 10* NBA!)
(NBA) Sacramento vs. Brooklyn,
02/05/2016 2:30 PM, Score: 119 - 128
Total: 212.00 | -108.00 Over
Result: Loss
Total: 212.00 | -108.00 Over
Result: Loss
This is a 10* TOTAL COAST-TO-COAST EXPRESS on the UNDER between the Sacramento Kings and the Brooklyn Nets.
We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest.
This particular play is based entirely on strong and relevant ATS statistics:
Note that Sacramento has seen the total go UNDER the number in 11 of 17 non-conference games this year, in 17 of 32 vs. poor defensive teams which allow 99-plus points per contest, in 11 of 19 when playing the role of favorite and interestingly, in four of five vs. the Atlantic.
And note that Brooklyn has seen the total go UNDER the number in four of five this season after playing to three or more consecutive OVERs, in 11 of 19 non-conference contests, in nine of 16 after three or more consecutive SU losses and interestingly in four of six vs. the Pacific division.
The bottom line: We feel that these trends are strong enough to pull the trigger on this selection, play on the UNDER.
AAA Sports
We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest.
This particular play is based entirely on strong and relevant ATS statistics:
Note that Sacramento has seen the total go UNDER the number in 11 of 17 non-conference games this year, in 17 of 32 vs. poor defensive teams which allow 99-plus points per contest, in 11 of 19 when playing the role of favorite and interestingly, in four of five vs. the Atlantic.
And note that Brooklyn has seen the total go UNDER the number in four of five this season after playing to three or more consecutive OVERs, in 11 of 19 non-conference contests, in nine of 16 after three or more consecutive SU losses and interestingly in four of six vs. the Pacific division.
The bottom line: We feel that these trends are strong enough to pull the trigger on this selection, play on the UNDER.
AAA Sports
