PREMIUM
AAA's 3-GAME MONEY-LINE DESTRUCTION PASS (GO 3-0, 100%!)
(NCAAB) College of Charleston vs. Northeastern,
02/25/2016 2:00 PM, Score: 57 - 58
Money Line: -167.00 Northeastern (Home)
Result: Win
Money Line: -167.00 Northeastern (Home)
Result: Win
7* MONEY-LINE PLAY on Northeastern.
We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest.
This particular play is based entirely on strong and relevant ATS statistics:
Note that Charleston is just 12-20 ATS in its last 32 following a loss vs. a conference rival, while Northeastern is 3-1 ATS this season in revenging a road loss vs. an opponent.
The bottom line: The Cougars of Charleston have failed to score 70 points in 13 games now and that includes two OT contests. The Huskies had won three in a row, including a three OT game against James Madison, before falling to Hofstra on Sunday. But the revenge factor and these strong trends make this a price that we can live with paying as we look for NORTHEASTERN to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night.
AAA Sports
We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest.
This particular play is based entirely on strong and relevant ATS statistics:
Note that Charleston is just 12-20 ATS in its last 32 following a loss vs. a conference rival, while Northeastern is 3-1 ATS this season in revenging a road loss vs. an opponent.
The bottom line: The Cougars of Charleston have failed to score 70 points in 13 games now and that includes two OT contests. The Huskies had won three in a row, including a three OT game against James Madison, before falling to Hofstra on Sunday. But the revenge factor and these strong trends make this a price that we can live with paying as we look for NORTHEASTERN to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night.
AAA Sports
